↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of eribulin in women with metastatic breast cancer: a pooled analysis of two phase 3 studies

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
172 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy of eribulin in women with metastatic breast cancer: a pooled analysis of two phase 3 studies
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10549-014-3144-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chris Twelves, Javier Cortes, Linda Vahdat, Martin Olivo, Yi He, Peter A. Kaufman, Ahmad Awada

Abstract

Data from two phase 3 studies of eribulin were pooled in analyses initially requested by the European Medicines Agency to assess whether specific patient subgroups, previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane, benefited from eribulin. Study 305/EMBRACE included women after two-to-five lines of chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer who were randomized to eribulin mesylate (1.4 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 21 days) or treatment of physician's choice. In Study 301, patients who had received up to two prior chemotherapy regimens for advanced disease were randomized to eribulin (as above) or capecitabine (1.25 g/m(2) b.i.d. on days 1-14 every 21 days). In the pooled population, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival and response rates were analysed in the intent-to-treat population and selected subgroups. Overall, 1,062 patients were randomized to eribulin and 802 patients to control. Median OS was 15.2 months with eribulin versus 12.8 months with control (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85; 95 % CI 0.77, 0.95; P = 0.003). In all subgroups assessed, OS data favoured eribulin; significant improvements occurred in some subgroups, notably in women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative disease (HR 0.82; P = 0.002), although the effect in those with HER2-negative but hormone-receptor-positive disease did not reach statistical significance; benefits were also seen, among others, in those with estrogen-receptor-negative and triple-negative disease. Eribulin improves OS in various patient subgroups with advanced/metastatic breast cancer who had previously received an anthracycline and a taxane. Women with HER2-negative disease are among those who may obtain benefit from eribulin.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 139 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 30 21%
Researcher 24 17%
Student > Master 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 34 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 44%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 41 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,724,074
of 23,271,751 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#225
of 4,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,321
of 264,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#5
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,271,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.