| Title |
Fluid management and goal-directed therapy as an adjunct to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12630-014-0266-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Timothy E. Miller, Anthony M. Roche, Michael Mythen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| South Africa | 1 | 10% |
| Sweden | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 200 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 13% |
| Other | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 58 | 27% |
| Unknown | 36 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 131 | 62% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 1% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 42 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2018.
All research outputs
#6,459,565
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#974
of 2,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,365
of 274,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#11
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,918 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.