↓ Skip to main content

Structural Insights into the Organization of the Cavin Membrane Coat Complex

Overview of attention for article published in Developmental Cell, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structural Insights into the Organization of the Cavin Membrane Coat Complex
Published in
Developmental Cell, November 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.10.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oleksiy Kovtun, Vikas A. Tillu, WooRam Jung, Natalya Leneva, Nicholas Ariotti, Natasha Chaudhary, Ramya A. Mandyam, Charles Ferguson, Garry P. Morgan, Wayne A. Johnston, Stephen J. Harrop, Kirill Alexandrov, Robert G. Parton, Brett M. Collins

Abstract

Caveolae are cell-surface membrane invaginations that play critical roles in cellular processes including signaling and membrane homeostasis. The cavin proteins, in cooperation with caveolins, are essential for caveola formation. Here we show that a minimal N-terminal domain of the cavins, termed HR1, is required and sufficient for their homo- and hetero-oligomerization. Crystal structures of the mouse cavin1 and zebrafish cavin4a HR1 domains reveal highly conserved trimeric coiled-coil architectures, with intersubunit interactions that determine the specificity of cavin-cavin interactions. The HR1 domain contains a basic surface patch that interacts with polyphosphoinositides and coordinates with additional membrane-binding sites within the cavin C terminus to facilitate membrane association and remodeling. Electron microscopy of purified cavins reveals the existence of large assemblies, composed of a repeating rod-like structural element, and we propose that these structures polymerize through membrane-coupled interactions to form the unique striations observed on the surface of caveolae in vivo.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 75 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 30%
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 23%
Chemistry 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 13 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2014.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Cell
#4,040
of 4,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,765
of 270,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Cell
#61
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.