| Title |
Homeopathic treatment of patients with dysmenorrhea: a prospective observational study with 2 years follow-up
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, February 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00404-009-0988-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claudia M. Witt, Rainer Lüdtke, Stefan N. Willich |
| Abstract |
Evaluating homeopathic treatment for dysmenorrhea. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 17% |
| Peru | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 8% |
| Norway | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 25% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 55% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 10% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2017.
All research outputs
#3,801,271
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#191
of 2,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,604
of 96,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.