↓ Skip to main content

Is Spirituality a Critical Ingredient of Meditation? Comparing the Effects of Spiritual Meditation, Secular Meditation, and Relaxation on Spiritual, Psychological, Cardiac, and Pain Outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Behavioral Medicine, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
268 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
339 Mendeley
Title
Is Spirituality a Critical Ingredient of Meditation? Comparing the Effects of Spiritual Meditation, Secular Meditation, and Relaxation on Spiritual, Psychological, Cardiac, and Pain Outcomes
Published in
Journal of Behavioral Medicine, July 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10865-005-9008-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy B. Wachholtz, Kenneth I. Pargament

Abstract

This study compared secular and spiritual forms of meditation to assess the benefits of a spiritual intervention. Participants were taught a meditation or relaxation technique to practice for 20 min a day for two weeks. After two weeks, participants returned to the lab, practiced their technique for 20 min, and placed their hand in a cold-water bath of 2 degrees C for as long as they could endure it. The length of time that individuals kept their hand in the water bath was measured. Pain, anxiety, mood, and the spiritual health were assessed following the two-week intervention. Significant interactions occurred (time x group); the Spiritual Meditation group had greater decreases in anxiety and more positive mood, spiritual health, and spiritual experiences than the other two groups. They also tolerated pain almost twice as long as the other two groups.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 339 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 326 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 17%
Student > Master 45 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 12%
Researcher 38 11%
Student > Bachelor 29 9%
Other 78 23%
Unknown 49 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 132 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 12%
Social Sciences 35 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 5%
Other 41 12%
Unknown 57 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,834,578
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#153
of 1,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,691
of 60,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them