↓ Skip to main content

HIV Testing Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in the Northeastern United States

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
HIV Testing Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in the Northeastern United States
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10461-017-1976-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tyler B. Wray, Philip A. Chan, Mark A. Celio, Ashley E. Pérez, Alexander C. Adia, Erik M. Simpanen, Laura-Allison Woods, Peter M. Monti

Abstract

Men who have sex with men (MSM) continue to be at especially high risk for HIV in the United States. Past studies have shown that rates of HIV testing differ across a number of demographic and behavioral factors, and this research may be helpful for targeting efforts to increase testing among certain subgroups of MSM. In this study, MSM were recruited from several online sources to complete a questionnaire on HIV testing. Generalized ordered logit models suggested that the odds of having tested within the last 12 months were higher among racial/ethnic minority MSM, those with a college degree, and those who engaged in more recent HIV-risk behavior. The odds of having tested within the last 12 months were also higher among those who reported having sex with a partner they met online in the last 12 months. Conversely, the odds of having tested in the last 12 months were lower among those who reported drinking alcohol heavily, when compared with more moderate drinkers, highlighting yet another potential impact of alcohol on HIV outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Master 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 15 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 17%
Psychology 6 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Unspecified 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 19 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2018.
All research outputs
#15,915,093
of 24,228,883 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#2,432
of 3,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,492
of 335,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#63
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,228,883 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.