↓ Skip to main content

Vulnerability of Breeding Waterbirds to Climate Change in the Prairie Pothole Region, U.S.A

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vulnerability of Breeding Waterbirds to Climate Change in the Prairie Pothole Region, U.S.A
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0096747
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valerie Steen, Susan K. Skagen, Barry R. Noon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 74 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 20%
Student > Master 15 20%
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 37%
Environmental Science 19 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 8%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,822,882
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#22,188
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,623
of 245,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#449
of 4,427 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,427 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.