↓ Skip to main content

マンネルヘイムのアジア旅行関連資料とそれに基づくチベット仏教徒の動向について

Overview of attention for article published in INNER ASIAN STUDIES, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
マンネルヘイムのアジア旅行関連資料とそれに基づくチベット仏教徒の動向について
Published in
INNER ASIAN STUDIES, March 2016
DOI 10.20708/innerasianstudies.31.0_145
Authors

石濱 裕美子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2018.
All research outputs
#14,479,843
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from INNER ASIAN STUDIES
#9
of 13 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,904
of 312,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from INNER ASIAN STUDIES
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.