↓ Skip to main content

Time course of safety and efficacy of aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who progressed on previous oxaliplatin-based therapy

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Cancer (1965), November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Time course of safety and efficacy of aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who progressed on previous oxaliplatin-based therapy
Published in
European Journal of Cancer (1965), November 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.10.019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Ruff, David R. Ferry, Radek Lakomỳ, Jana Prausová, Guy A. Van Hazel, Paulo M. Hoff, David Cunningham, Dirk Arnold, Hans J. Schmoll, Vladimir M. Moiseyenko, Joseph J. McKendrick, Albert J. ten Tije, Raghu L. Vishwanath, Pankaj Bhargava, Soazig Chevalier, Teresa Macarulla, Eric Van Cutsem

Abstract

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) previously-treated with oxaliplatin benefit significantly from the addition of aflibercept to FOLFIRI in relation to overall survival, progression-free survival and response rate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 61 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Other 15 24%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2017.
All research outputs
#2,450,106
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Cancer (1965)
#614
of 6,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,490
of 269,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Cancer (1965)
#3
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.