↓ Skip to main content

Failure rates of class V restorations in the management of root caries in adults – a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Gerodontology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Failure rates of class V restorations in the management of root caries in adults – a systematic review
Published in
Gerodontology, November 2014
DOI 10.1111/ger.12167
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martina Hayes, Paul Brady, Francis M Burke, P Finbarr Allen

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to compare cumulative failure rates of different restorative materials in carious class V lesions on the root surfaces of adult patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 19 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 52%
Materials Science 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 19 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2015.
All research outputs
#6,480,206
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Gerodontology
#88
of 474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,932
of 263,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gerodontology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 474 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.