↓ Skip to main content

Effect of having private health insurance on the use of health care services: the case of Spain

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Effect of having private health insurance on the use of health care services: the case of Spain
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12913-017-2667-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Cantarero-Prieto, Marta Pascual-Sáez, Noelia Gonzalez-Prieto

Abstract

Several stakeholders have undertaken initiatives to propose solutions towards a more sustainable health system and Spain, as an example of a European country affected by austerity measures, is looking for ways to cut healthcare budgets. The aim of this paper is to study the effect of private health insurance on health care utilization using the latest micro-data from the European Community Household Panel (ECHP), the Spanish National Health Survey (SNHS) and the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC). We use matching techniques based on propensity score methods: single match, four matches, bias-adjustment and allowing for heteroskedasticity. The results demonstrate that people with a private health insurance, use the public health system less than individuals without double health insurance coverage. Our conclusions are useful when policy makers design public-private partnership policies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 19%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 22 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 32 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2020.
All research outputs
#5,813,304
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,504
of 7,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,266
of 327,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#36
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.