↓ Skip to main content

Pocket-size, portable surface EMG device in the differentiation of low back pain patients

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, August 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Pocket-size, portable surface EMG device in the differentiation of low back pain patients
Published in
European Spine Journal, August 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf00303412
Authors

P. Jalovaara, T. Niinim�ki, H. Vanharanta

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Other 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 25%
Sports and Recreations 4 17%
Engineering 3 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2014.
All research outputs
#14,789,596
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#1,913
of 4,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,009
of 23,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,616 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.