↓ Skip to main content

Methylation of miR124a-1, miR124a-2, and miR124a-3 in Hodgkin lymphoma

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Methylation of miR124a-1, miR124a-2, and miR124a-3 in Hodgkin lymphoma
Published in
Tumor Biology, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13277-014-2802-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Ben Dhiab, S. Ziadi, F. Ksiaa, T. Louhichi, R. Ben Gacem, A. Ben Zineb, K. Amara, M. Hachana, Mounir Trimeche

Abstract

Deregulation of the microRNA miR124a by DNA methylation has been implicated in various malignancies, but no study reported its methylation status in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). We evaluated the methylation of the three loci encoding for miR124a using methylation-specific PCR in 64 HL patients and 15 reactive lymph nodes obtained from patients with nonmalignant diseases. Results were correlated with clinicopathological parameters. Methylation rates of miR124a-1, miR124a-2, and miR124a-3 in HL were 17, 50, and 28 %, respectively. None of the nontumoral samples showed aberrant hypermethylation in any of the miR tested. In HL cases, we found that miR124a-1 methylation correlates with high-risk International Prognostic Score (IPS) (score >3, p = 0.04) and that miR124a-2 methylation was more frequent in children (82.3 %, p = 0.006) and men (63.9 %, p = 0.01). Methylation of miR124a-3 was associated with advanced Ann-Arbor stages (p = 0.007). The survival analysis showed that methylation of at least one of the miR124a genes was associated with shortened event-free survival in univariate (p = 0.03) and multivariate (p = 0.02) analyses. These results suggest that miR124a methylation is associated with aggressive HL disease and may be an interesting factor for predicting treatment response.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 14%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 7%
Sports and Recreations 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2014.
All research outputs
#20,242,779
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,834
of 2,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,335
of 256,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#90
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.