You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Application of cell-based bioassays to evaluate treatment efficacy of conventional and intensified treatment wetlands
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1039/c7ew00341b |
| Authors |
Jaime Nivala, Peta A. Neale, Tobias Haasis, Stefanie Kahl, Maria König, Roland A. Müller, Thorsten Reemtsma, Rita Schlichting, Beate I. Escher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 18% |
| Researcher | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 11 | 22% |
| Engineering | 9 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 19 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2017.
All research outputs
#20,970,494
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
#634
of 868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#346,237
of 452,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
#48
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.