You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In situ analysis of foliar zinc absorption and short-distance movement in fresh and hydrated leaves of tomato and citrus using synchrotron-based X-ray fluorescence microscopy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Botany, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1093/aob/mcu212 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yumei Du, Peter M. Kopittke, Barry N. Noller, Simon A. James, Hugh H. Harris, Zhi Ping Xu, Peng Li, David R. Mulligan, Longbin Huang |
| Abstract |
Globally, zinc deficiency is one of the most important nutritional factors limiting crop yield and quality. Despite widespread use of foliar-applied zinc fertilizers, much remains unknown regarding the movement of zinc from the foliar surface into the vascular structure for translocation into other tissues and the key factors affecting this diffusion. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 24% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 16 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2014.
All research outputs
#5,668,232
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Botany
#1,812
of 3,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,685
of 258,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Botany
#24
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.