| Title |
The effect of motivational interviewing on glycaemic control and perceived competence of diabetes self-management in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus after attending a group education programme: a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diabetologia, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00125-011-2120-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L. K. Rosenbek Minet, L. Wagner, E. M. Lønvig, J. Hjelmborg, J. E. Henriksen |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to measure the efficacy of motivational interviewing (MI) compared with usual care on changes in glycaemic control and competence of diabetes self-management in patients with diabetes mellitus. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 192 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 11% |
| Researcher | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 43 | 22% |
| Unknown | 38 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 16% |
| Psychology | 21 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 13% |
| Unknown | 40 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2014.
All research outputs
#15,310,081
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#4,449
of 5,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,116
of 109,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#27
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.