↓ Skip to main content

Pressure applied during surgery alters the biomechanical properties of human saphenous vein graft

Overview of attention for article published in Heart and Vessels, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Pressure applied during surgery alters the biomechanical properties of human saphenous vein graft
Published in
Heart and Vessels, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00380-012-0245-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Necla Ozturk, Nehir Sucu, Ulku Comelekoglu, Banu Coskun Yilmaz, Barlas Naim Aytacoglu, Ozden Vezir

Abstract

Pressure applied during harvesting of the saphenous vein (SV) graft in coronary artery bypass surgery might change its mechanical properties and thereby decrease the patency. This study was performed to assess the mechanical properties of the SV graft distended manually with different levels of pressure and to determine the pressure level that induces changes in its structure and mechanics. Saphenous vein graft segments, collected from 36 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery, were distended with pressures of either 50-60, 75-100, or 130-150 mmHg. Grafts were tested for the stress-strain relationship; the Young's moduli at the low- and high-strain regions were calculated, and their structures were examined by light and electron microscopy. Pressures of 50-60 mmHg did not influence the mechanics of the vein graft, whereas pressures of 75-100 mmHg elevated the elastic modulus of the vein at the low-strain region while pressures above 130 mmHg increased the elastic moduli at both low- and high-strain regions. There was a prominent loss of microfibrils at all distending pressure levels. The mechanical results suggest that distending pressures above 75 mmHg might play a role in graft failure. Furthermore, the absence of microfibrils surrounding elastin suggests that application of distending pressures, even as low as 50 mmHg, can cause degeneration of the elastic fibers following implantation, increasing the stiffness of the graft and thus impairing the graft's function under its new hemodynamic conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 4 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 17%
Student > Master 3 17%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 22%
Unspecified 1 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2014.
All research outputs
#21,162,249
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Heart and Vessels
#516
of 693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,549
of 162,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart and Vessels
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 693 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.