↓ Skip to main content

Transglutaminase 2 and neuroinflammation

Overview of attention for article published in Amino Acids, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Transglutaminase 2 and neuroinflammation
Published in
Amino Acids, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00726-014-1864-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Riccardo Ientile, Monica Currò, Daniela Caccamo

Abstract

Neuroinflammatory processes seem to play a pivotal role in various chronic neurodegenerative diseases, characterized also by the pathogenetic accumulation of specific protein aggregates. Several of these proteins have been shown to be substrates of transglutaminases, calcium-dependent enzymes that catalyze protein crosslinking reactions. However, it has recently been demonstrated that transglutaminase 2 (TG2) may also be involved in molecular mechanisms underlying inflammation. In the central nervous system, astrocytes and microglia are the cell types mainly involved in the inflammatory process. This review is focused on the increases of TG2 protein expression and enzyme activity that occur in astroglial, microglial and monocyte cell models in response to inflammatory stimuli. The transcription factor NF-κB is considered the main regulator of inflammation, being activated by a variety of stimuli including calcium influx, oxidative stress and inflammatory cytokines. Under these conditions, the over-expression of TG2 results in the sustained activation of NF-κB. Several findings emphasize the possible role of the TG2/NF-κB activation pathway in neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Although further studies are needed to characterize the TG2/NF-κB cross-talk in monocytes/macrophages/microglia within the central nervous system, some results show that TG2 and NF-κB are co-localized in cell compartments. Together, evidence suggests that TG2 plays a role in neuroinflammation and contributes to the production of compounds that are potentially deleterious to neuronal cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 24%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Researcher 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 11 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 12 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2014.
All research outputs
#20,242,779
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Amino Acids
#1,281
of 1,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,335
of 256,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amino Acids
#24
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.