↓ Skip to main content

Mechanical characterization of a customized decellularized scaffold for vascular tissue engineering

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanical characterization of a customized decellularized scaffold for vascular tissue engineering
Published in
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, December 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.12.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

W.S. Sheridan, G.P. Duffy, B.P. Murphy

Abstract

Several challenges persist when attempting to utilize decellularized tissue as a scaffold for vascular tissue engineering. Namely: poor cell infiltration/migration, excessive culture times associated with repopulating the scaffolds, and the achievement of a quiescent medial layer. In an attempt to create an optimum vascular scaffold, we customized the properties of decellularized porcine carotid arteries by: (i) creating cavities within the medial layer to allow direct injection of cells, and (ii) controlling the amount of collagen digestion to increase the porosity. Histological examination of our customized scaffold revealed a highly porous tissue structure containing consistent medial cavities running longitudinally through the porous scaffold wall. Mechanical testing of the customized scaffold showed that our minimal localized disruption to the ECM does not have a detrimental effect on the bulk mechanical response of the tissue. The results demonstrate that an increased stiffness and reduced distensibility occurs after decellularization when compared to the native tissue, however post scaffold customization we can revert the scaffold tensile properties back to that of the native tissue. This most noteworthy result occurs in the elastin dominant phase of the tensile response of the scaffold, indicating that no disruption has occurred to the elastin network by our decellularization and customization techniques. Additionally, the bulk seeding potential of the customized scaffold was demonstrated by direct injection of human smooth muscle cells through the medial cavities. The optimum cell dispersion was observed in the highest porosity scaffold, with large cell numbers retained within the medial layer after 24 h static culture. In summary, this study presents a novel customized decellularized vascular scaffold that has the capability of bulk seeding the media, and in tandem to this method, the porosity of the scaffold has been increased without compromising the mechanical integrity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 142 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 27%
Student > Master 29 20%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 45 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Materials Science 5 3%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 33 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
#1,151
of 1,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,098
of 249,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
#12
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,333 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.