You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association Between Use of β-Blockers and Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2014.15241 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lars H. Lund, Lina Benson, Ulf Dahlström, Magnus Edner, Leif Friberg |
| Abstract |
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) may be as common and may have similar mortality as heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF). β-Blockers reduce mortality in HFREF but are inadequately studied in HFPEF. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 121 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 13% |
| Spain | 12 | 10% |
| Mexico | 8 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 6% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| Japan | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 50 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 85 | 70% |
| Scientists | 18 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 152 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 13% |
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 41 | 26% |
| Unknown | 29 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 87 | 55% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 35 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 156. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2021.
All research outputs
#263,984
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#3,415
of 36,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,851
of 370,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#41
of 366 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 366 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.