↓ Skip to main content

Hypothesis: Origin of Life in Deep-Reaching Tectonic Faults

Overview of attention for article published in Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 476)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Hypothesis: Origin of Life in Deep-Reaching Tectonic Faults
Published in
Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11084-012-9267-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ulrich Schreiber, Oliver Locker-Grütjen, Christian Mayer

Abstract

The worldwide discussion on the origin of life encounters difficulties when it comes to estimate the conditions of the early earth and to define plausible environments for the development of the first complex organic molecules. Until now, the role of the earth's crust has been more or less ignored. In our opinion, deep-reaching open, interconnected tectonic fault systems may provide possible reaction habitats ranging from nano- to centimetre and even larger dimensions for the formation of prebiotic molecules. In addition to the presence of all necessary raw materials including phosphate, as well as variable pressure and temperature conditions, we suggest that supercritical CO2 as a nonpolar solvent could have played an important role. A hypothetical model for the origin of life is proposed which will be used to design crucial experiments for the model's verification. Because all proposed processes could still occur in tectonic faults at the present time, it may be possible to detect and analyse the formation of prebiotic molecules in order to assess the validity of the proposed hypothesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
France 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 38 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 29%
Student > Master 6 14%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 33%
Chemistry 7 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 4 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2016.
All research outputs
#1,365,865
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres
#31
of 476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,217
of 158,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them