↓ Skip to main content

Quantum dot bioconjugates for imaging, labelling and sensing

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Materials, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
patent
114 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5605 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2862 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantum dot bioconjugates for imaging, labelling and sensing
Published in
Nature Materials, June 2005
DOI 10.1038/nmat1390
Pubmed ID
Authors

Igor L. Medintz, H. Tetsuo Uyeda, Ellen R. Goldman, Hedi Mattoussi

Abstract

One of the fastest moving and most exciting interfaces of nanotechnology is the use of quantum dots (QDs) in biology. The unique optical properties of QDs make them appealing as in vivo and in vitro fluorophores in a variety of biological investigations, in which traditional fluorescent labels based on organic molecules fall short of providing long-term stability and simultaneous detection of multiple signals. The ability to make QDs water soluble and target them to specific biomolecules has led to promising applications in cellular labelling, deep-tissue imaging, assay labelling and as efficient fluorescence resonance energy transfer donors. Despite recent progress, much work still needs to be done to achieve reproducible and robust surface functionalization and develop flexible bioconjugation techniques. In this review, we look at current methods for preparing QD bioconjugates as well as presenting an overview of applications. The potential of QDs in biology has just begun to be realized and new avenues will arise as our ability to manipulate these materials improves.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,862 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 41 1%
Germany 17 <1%
United Kingdom 12 <1%
Japan 10 <1%
France 9 <1%
India 5 <1%
China 4 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 4 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
Other 44 2%
Unknown 2712 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 880 31%
Researcher 438 15%
Student > Master 349 12%
Student > Bachelor 233 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 145 5%
Other 422 15%
Unknown 395 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 834 29%
Physics and Astronomy 317 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 292 10%
Materials Science 269 9%
Engineering 243 8%
Other 400 14%
Unknown 507 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,338,168
of 25,470,300 outputs
Outputs from Nature Materials
#1,173
of 4,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,802
of 68,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Materials
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,470,300 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.