↓ Skip to main content

Health professionals’ evaluation of delivering treatment-focused genetic testing to women newly diagnosed with breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Familial Cancer, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Health professionals’ evaluation of delivering treatment-focused genetic testing to women newly diagnosed with breast cancer
Published in
Familial Cancer, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10689-014-9770-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kirsten F. L. Douma, Bettina Meiser, Judy Kirk, Gillian Mitchell, Christobel Saunders, Belinda Rahman, Mariana S. Sousa, Kristine Barlow-Stewart, Margaret Gleeson, Kathy Tucker

Abstract

Increasingly, women are offered genetic testing shortly after diagnosis of breast cancer to facilitate decision-making about treatment, often referred to as 'treatment-focused genetic testing' (TFGT). As understanding the attitudes of health professionals is likely to inform its integration into clinical care we surveyed professionals who participated in our TFGT randomized control study. Thirty-six completed surveys were received (response rate 59 %), 15 (42 %) health professionals classified as genetic and 21 (58 %) as non-genetic. Mainly positive experiences with participating in the TFGT trial were reported. The high cost of testing and who could best deliver information about TGFT to the patient were raised as key constraints to implementation of TFGT in usual care. More non-genetic than genetic health professionals (44 vs 8 %) preferred that the surgeon provide the information for decision-making about TFGT. While costs of TFGT itself and the time and effort of staff involved were perceived barriers, as testing costs become lower, it is expected that TFGT will become a routine part of standard clinical care for patients at high genetic risk in the near future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 23%
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 11 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Psychology 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 14 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2014.
All research outputs
#6,533,176
of 24,849,927 outputs
Outputs from Familial Cancer
#122
of 581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,108
of 264,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Familial Cancer
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,849,927 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 581 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.