| Title |
Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of a structured collaborative disease management in the Interdisciplinary Network for Heart Failure (INH) study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Research in Cardiology, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00392-014-0781-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anja Neumann, Sarah Mostardt, Janine Biermann, Götz Gelbrich, Alexander Goehler, Benjamin P. Geisler, Uwe Siebert, Stefan Störk, Georg Ertl, Christiane E. Angerrmann, Jürgen Wasem |
| Abstract |
Non-pharmacological treatment programmes are being developed, in which specialised nurses take care of heart failure (HF) patients. Such disease management programmes might increase survival and quality of life in HF patients, but evidence on their cost-effectiveness remains limited. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 15% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,448,111
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#292
of 809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,018
of 362,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.