↓ Skip to main content

The de ritis ratio: the test of time.

Overview of attention for article published in The Clinical Biochemist Reviews, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 126)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
12 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
346 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
384 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The de ritis ratio: the test of time.
Published in
The Clinical Biochemist Reviews, November 2013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mona Botros, Kenneth A Sikaris

Abstract

De Ritis described the ratio between the serum levels of aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) almost 50 years ago. While initially described as a characteristic of acute viral hepatitis where ALT was usually higher than AST, other authors have subsequently found it useful in alcoholic hepatitis, where AST is usually higher than ALT. These interpretations are far too simplistic however as acute viral hepatitis can have AST greater than ALT, and this can be a sign of fulminant disease, while alcoholic hepatitis can have ALT greater than AST when several days have elapsed since alcohol exposure. The ratio therefore represents the time course and aggressiveness of disease that would be predicted from the relatively short half-life of AST (18 h) compared to ALT (36 h). In chronic viral illnesses such as chronic viral hepatitis and chronic alcoholism as well as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, an elevated AST/ALT ratio is predictive of long terms complications including fibrosis and cirrhosis. There are methodological issues, particularly whether or not pyridoxal phosphate is used in the transaminase assays, and although this can have specific effects when patient samples are deficient in this vitamin, these method differences generally have mild effects on the usefulness of the assays or the ratio. Ideally laboratories should be using pyridoxal phosphate supplemented assays in alcoholic, elderly and cancer patients who may be pyridoxine deplete. Ideally all laboratories reporting abnormal ALT should also report AST and calculate the De Ritis ratio because it provides useful diagnostic and prognostic information.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 384 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Lebanon 1 <1%
Unknown 378 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 65 17%
Student > Master 41 11%
Researcher 35 9%
Student > Postgraduate 35 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 9%
Other 73 19%
Unknown 100 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 125 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 2%
Other 39 10%
Unknown 118 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2023.
All research outputs
#994,364
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from The Clinical Biochemist Reviews
#10
of 126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,858
of 227,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Clinical Biochemist Reviews
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them