↓ Skip to main content

Perceptions of Plagiarism by STEM Graduate Students: A Case Study

Overview of attention for article published in Science and Engineering Ethics, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Perceptions of Plagiarism by STEM Graduate Students: A Case Study
Published in
Science and Engineering Ethics, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11948-014-9604-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Leonard, David Schwieder, Amy Buhler, Denise Beaubien Bennett, Melody Royster

Abstract

Issues of academic integrity, specifically knowledge of, perceptions and attitudes toward plagiarism, are well documented in post-secondary settings using case studies for specific courses, recording discourse with focus groups, analyzing cross-cultural education philosophies, and reviewing the current literature. In this paper, the authors examine the perceptions of graduate students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines at the University of Florida regarding misconduct and integrity issues. Results revealed students' perceptions of the definition and seriousness of potential academic misconduct, knowledge of institutional procedures, and views on faculty actions, all with a focus on divergences between US and internationally-educated students. The open-ended questions provide anecdotal evidence to highlight personal experiences, positive and negative, aimed at the faculty, international students and undergraduates. Combined, these findings outline an important part of the campus academic integrity culture at a major American university. Recommendations for local actions also are discussed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Greece 1 1%
Unknown 91 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 10 11%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Lecturer 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Other 35 37%
Unknown 16 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 25 27%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 9%
Engineering 7 7%
Psychology 6 6%
Arts and Humanities 5 5%
Other 22 23%
Unknown 21 22%