↓ Skip to main content

Correction: Corrigendum: High-throughput discovery of novel developmental phenotypes

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction: Corrigendum: High-throughput discovery of novel developmental phenotypes
Published in
Nature, November 2017
DOI 10.1038/nature24643
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary E. Dickinson, Ann M. Flenniken, Xiao Ji, Lydia Teboul, Michael D. Wong, Jacqueline K. White, Terrence F. Meehan, Wolfgang J. Weninger, Henrik Westerberg, Hibret Adissu, Candice N. Baker, Lynette Bower, James M. Brown, L. Brianna Caddle, Francesco Chiani, Dave Clary, James Cleak, Mark J. Daly, James M. Denegre, Brendan Doe, Mary E. Dolan, Sarah M. Edie Helmut Fuchs, Valerie Gailus-Durner, Antonella Galli, Alessia Gambadoro, Juan Gallegos, Shiying Guo, Neil R. Horner, Chih-Wei Hsu, Sara J. Johnson, Sowmya Kalaga, Lance C. Keith, Louise Lanoue, Thomas N. Lawson, Monkol Lek, Manuel Mark, Susan Marschall, Jeremy Mason, Melissa L. McElwee, Susan Newbigging Lauryl M. J. Nutter, Kevin A. Peterson, Ramiro Ramirez-Solis, Douglas J. Rowland, Edward Ryder, Kaitlin E. Samocha, John R. Seavitt, Mohammed Selloum, Zsombor Szoke-Kovacs, Masaru Tamura, Amanda G. Trainor, Ilinca Tudose, Shigeharu Wakana, Jonathan Warren, Olivia Wendling, David B. West, Leeyean Wong, Atsushi Yoshiki, Wolfgang Wurst, Daniel G. MacArthur, Glauco P. Tocchini-Valentini, Xiang Gao, Paul Flicek, Allan Bradley, William C. Skarnes, Monica J. Justice, Helen E. Parkinson, Mark Moore, Sara Wells, Robert E. Braun, Karen L. Svenson, Martin Hrabe de Angelis, Yann Herault, Tim Mohun, Ann-Marie Mallon, R. Mark Henkelman, Steve D. M. Brown, David J. Adams, K. C. Kent Lloyd, Colin McKerlie, Arthur L. Beaudet, Maja Bućan Stephen A. Murray

Abstract

This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/nature19356.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Other 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 50%
Computer Science 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2017.
All research outputs
#20,451,991
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#90,061
of 91,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,901
of 331,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#1,011
of 1,020 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,020 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.