↓ Skip to main content

Coronary revascularization in diabetic patients: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Overview of attention for article published in ACP Journal Club, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
11 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coronary revascularization in diabetic patients: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Published in
ACP Journal Club, November 2014
DOI 10.7326/m14-0808
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benny Tu, Ben Rich, Christopher Labos, James M Brophy

Abstract

The optimal revascularization technique in diabetic patients is an important unresolved question.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Russia 1 2%
Unknown 52 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Master 8 15%
Other 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 14 25%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 49%
Arts and Humanities 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Mathematics 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 12 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2015.
All research outputs
#2,726,141
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from ACP Journal Club
#4,817
of 13,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,589
of 370,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACP Journal Club
#71
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.