↓ Skip to main content

A risk classification for immunosuppressive treatment-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroVirology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
7 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
A risk classification for immunosuppressive treatment-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy
Published in
Journal of NeuroVirology, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13365-014-0303-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Salim Chahin, Joseph R. Berger

Abstract

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a rare, complex opportunistic infection of the central nervous system caused by the JC virus. This past decade, PML was increasingly recognized to be associated with the use of immunosuppressive and biologic agents. The risk for PML differs among these agents and remains difficult to quantify because of the complex pathogenesis of PML and the presence of confounding factors. This paper explores and updates the association of PML with different biologic and immunosuppressive agents and proposes an expanded classification system for the risk of PML. We identify three classes of drug that vary by PML risk, latency to infection, and underlying illness. We also review some of the most common agents with known associations to PML and explore risk mitigation strategies that aim to inform the decision-making process for clinicians and patients in the face of the changing incidence of PML and the growing landscape of immunologic agents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Master 6 14%
Other 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 11 26%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 40%
Neuroscience 5 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 11 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#5,531,092
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroVirology
#149
of 925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,507
of 362,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroVirology
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 925 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.