↓ Skip to main content

Formation of hydroxyapatite on titanium implants in vivo precedes bone-formation during healing

Overview of attention for article published in Biointerphases, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Formation of hydroxyapatite on titanium implants in vivo precedes bone-formation during healing
Published in
Biointerphases, October 2017
DOI 10.1116/1.4993986
Pubmed ID
Authors

Per Malmberg, Narmin Bigdeli, Jens Jensen, Håkan Nygren

Abstract

The bone material interface has been an area of intense study over many decades, where studies of the healing process ranging from simple mineral deposition in vitro to actual healing in vivo have given important clues to the importance of calcium minerals in the bone/implant interface. Here, the authors use a combination of in vitro cell culture methods and in vivo implantation to study how the role of the spontaneously formed hydroxyapatite layer on Ti-implants for the in vivo-healing into the bone tissue of rat tibia. Initial experiments were made in reduced systems by incubation of TiO2 in cell culture medium and analysis by time of flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy followed by subsequent exposure of human embryological stem cells analyzed by von Kossa staining and environmental scanning electron microsopy. In vivo studies of the bone-material interface was analyzed by ToF-SIMS depth profiling using both C60(+) ions as well as a gas cluster ion source beam, Ar1500(+) as sputter source. The low ion yield of the Ar1500(+) for inorganics allowed the inorganic/organic interface of the implant to be studied avoiding the erosion of the inorganic materials caused by the conventional C60(+) beam.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 33%
Student > Master 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 3 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 22%
Chemistry 1 11%
Physics and Astronomy 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,850,570
of 23,942,155 outputs
Outputs from Biointerphases
#149
of 544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,693
of 331,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biointerphases
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,942,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.