↓ Skip to main content

High mTOR expression independently prognosticates poor clinical outcome to induction chemotherapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Experimental Medicine, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
High mTOR expression independently prognosticates poor clinical outcome to induction chemotherapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Published in
Clinical and Experimental Medicine, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10238-017-0478-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Asheema Khanna, Bharat Bhushan, Pradeep Singh Chauhan, Sunita Saxena, Dipendra Kumar Gupta, Fouzia Siraj

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 7 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2018.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Experimental Medicine
#295
of 606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,211
of 340,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Experimental Medicine
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.