↓ Skip to main content

A refined ecological risk assessment for California red‐legged frog, Delta smelt, and California tiger salamander exposed to malathion

Overview of attention for article published in Integrated Environmental Assessment & Management, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A refined ecological risk assessment for California red‐legged frog, Delta smelt, and California tiger salamander exposed to malathion
Published in
Integrated Environmental Assessment & Management, December 2017
DOI 10.1002/ieam.2002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yvonne H Clemow, Gillian E Manning, Roger L Breton, Michael F Winchell, Lauren Padilla, Sara I Rodney, John P Hanzas, Tammara L Estes, Katherine Budreski, Brent N Toth, Katie L Hill, Colleen D Priest, R Scott Teed, Loren D Knopper, Dwayne RJ Moore, Christopher T Stone, Paul Whatling

Abstract

The California red-legged frog (CRLF), delta smelt (DS), and the California tiger salamander (CTS) are three species listed under the United States Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), all of which inhabit aquatic ecosystems in California. The US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has conducted deterministic screening-level risk assessments for these species potentially exposed to malathion, an organophosphorus insecticide and acaricide. Results from our screening-level analyses identified potential risk of direct effects to DS as well as indirect effects to all three species via reduction in prey. Accordingly, for those species and scenarios in which risk was identified at the screening-level, we conducted a refined probabilistic risk assessment for CRLF, DS, and CTS. The refined ERA was conducted using best available data and approaches, as recommended by the 2013 National Research Council (NRC) report Assessing Risks to Endangered and Threatened Species from Pesticides. Refined aquatic exposure models including the Pesticide Root Zone Model (PRZM), the Vegetative Filter Strip Modeling System (VFSMOD), the Variable Volume Water Model (VVWM), the Exposure Analysis Modeling System (EXAMS), and the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) were used to generate estimated exposure concentrations (EECs) for malathion based on worst-case scenarios in California. Refined effects analyses involved developing concentration-response curves for fish and species sensitivity distributions (SSDs) for fish and aquatic invertebrates. Quantitative risk curves, field and mesocosm studies, surface water monitoring data, and incident reports were considered in a weight-of-evidence approach. Currently labeled uses of malathion are not expected to result in direct effects to CRLF, DS or CTS, or indirect effects due to effects on fish and invertebrate prey. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Lecturer 4 10%
Other 4 10%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 12 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 11 26%
Engineering 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 15 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2017.
All research outputs
#17,534,407
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Integrated Environmental Assessment & Management
#557
of 981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,937
of 449,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Integrated Environmental Assessment & Management
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.