↓ Skip to main content

International Scholarship Programs of the American College of Surgeons: Expansion of the Global Surgical Network

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
International Scholarship Programs of the American College of Surgeons: Expansion of the Global Surgical Network
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00268-017-4284-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giuseppe Nigri, Kate Early, George Tsoulfas, Alberto Ferreres, Cristina R. Ferrone, Richard Schulick, Waddah B. Al‐Refaie, Patricia L. Turner, George Velmahos

Abstract

The American College of Surgeons has always promoted education and collaborations with other countries and their scientific organizations. The International Guest Scholarship program was established in 1968 to support the travel of foreign surgeons to medical Institutions in the USA and Canada. The program has grown substantially over time and now includes different categories of scholarships and surgeons. The objective of this article is to describe the experiences gained by the international scholars who visited US and Canadian institutions through these ACS programs. In order to collect information regarding these scholarships from the surgeons who have already participated in the program, an Internet-based survey was e-mailed to alumni. The surveys were constructed to gather career information on former scholars and to analyze the perceived impact of these programs on their careers. Among the international scholarships alumni, most are now Fellows of the American College of Surgeons. The majority of respondents maintained contact with their host surgeons in the USA or Canada; they began or continued research, surgical education and surgical quality improvement initiatives in their country of origin based upon their experiences as international scholars. Most of the alumni reported that the experience they had during the scholarship was inspiring, opened their minds and broadened their horizons. The overall effect of ACS international scholarship program should be considered as positive, as 80-90% of respondent alumni consider their experience very helpful and feel that it provided them with opportunities that would not have been possible without it. It is incumbent upon the ACS to continue along this path by identifying funding and donation sources, as well as enriching the content and goals.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Lecturer 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 40%
Psychology 3 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2017.
All research outputs
#15,483,707
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#3,063
of 4,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,765
of 328,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#79
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.