↓ Skip to main content

Education and Parental Involvement in Decision‐Making About Newborn Screening: Understanding Goals to Clarify Content

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Genetic Counseling, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Education and Parental Involvement in Decision‐Making About Newborn Screening: Understanding Goals to Clarify Content
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10897-014-9780-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beth K. Potter, Holly Etchegary, Stuart G. Nicholls, Brenda J. Wilson, Samantha M. Craigie, Makda H. Araia

Abstract

A challenge in designing effective education for parents about newborn screening (NBS) has been uncertainty about appropriate content. Arguing that the goals of education may be usefully tied to parental decision-making, we sought to: (1) explore how different ways of implementing NBS differ in their approaches to parental engagement in decision-making; (2) map the potential goals of education onto these "implementation models"; and (3) consider the content that may be needed to support these goals. The resulting conceptual framework supports the availability of comprehensive information about NBS for parents, irrespective of the model of implementation. This is largely because we argue that meeting parental expectations and preferences for communication is an important goal regardless of whether or notparents are actively involved in making a decision. Our analysis supports a flexible approach, in which some educational messages are emphasized as important for all parents to understand while others are made available depending on parents' preferences. We have begun to define the content of NBS education for parents needed to support specific goals. Further research and discussion is important to determine the most appropriate strategies for delivering the tailored approach to education that emerged from our analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 23%
Other 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 19%
Social Sciences 7 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Psychology 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 10 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2014.
All research outputs
#18,383,471
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#937
of 1,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,144
of 362,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#19
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.