| Title |
Hierarchical ordering of sequential processes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Informatica, June 1971
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00289519 |
| Authors |
E. W. Dijkstra |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 47 | 57% |
| Engineering | 12 | 14% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,864,138
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Acta Informatica
#4
of 164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112
of 3,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Informatica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 164 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them