↓ Skip to main content

A Comparison of the Energetic Cost of Running in Marathon Racing Shoes

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 2,898)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
74 news outlets
blogs
11 blogs
twitter
320 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
16 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
238 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
594 Mendeley
Title
A Comparison of the Energetic Cost of Running in Marathon Racing Shoes
Published in
Sports Medicine, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40279-017-0811-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wouter Hoogkamer, Shalaya Kipp, Jesse H. Frank, Emily M. Farina, Geng Luo, Rodger Kram

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 320 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 594 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 594 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 95 16%
Student > Bachelor 88 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 12%
Researcher 47 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 4%
Other 70 12%
Unknown 201 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 153 26%
Engineering 84 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Other 56 9%
Unknown 234 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 886. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#20,225
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#9
of 2,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#328
of 319,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#1
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.