| Title |
Pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence in developing countries: review of prevalence and risk factors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00192-010-1215-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Godfrey J. A. Walker, Prasanna Gunasekera |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 253 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 9% |
| Researcher | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 9% |
| Other | 52 | 20% |
| Unknown | 78 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 93 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 15% |
| Engineering | 12 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 7% |
| Unknown | 85 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2017.
All research outputs
#983,816
of 25,611,630 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#55
of 2,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,802
of 105,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,611,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,912 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.