| Title |
Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Research in Cardiology, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00392-017-1182-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mahek Shah, Soumya Patnaik, Brijesh Patel, Pradhum Ram, Lohit Garg, Manyoo Agarwal, Sahil Agrawal, Shilpkumar Arora, Nilay Patel, Joyce Wald, Ulrich P. Jorde |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 25% |
| Canada | 2 | 17% |
| Colombia | 1 | 8% |
| Italy | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 8% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 153 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 10% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 18% |
| Unknown | 47 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 51% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 58 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2021.
All research outputs
#5,321,975
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#224
of 1,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,736
of 341,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.