↓ Skip to main content

Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula versus low-flow nasal cannula as weaning mode from nasal CPAP in infants ≤28 weeks of gestation

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula versus low-flow nasal cannula as weaning mode from nasal CPAP in infants ≤28 weeks of gestation
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00431-013-2116-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jose Ramon Fernandez-Alvarez, Rashmi Shreyans Gandhi, Philip Amess, Liam Mahoney, Ryan Watkins, Heike Rabe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 103 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Master 13 12%
Other 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 24 23%
Unknown 25 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Psychology 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 32 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2021.
All research outputs
#6,138,050
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1,190
of 3,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,853
of 196,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#5
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.