Title |
A comparison of drugs and procedures of care in the Italian hospice and hospital settings: the final three days of life for cancer patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12913-014-0496-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Emily West, Massimo Costantini, H Roeline Pasman, Bregje Onwuteaka-Philipsen |
Abstract |
A palliative approach at the end of life typically involves forgoing certain drugs and procedures and starting others - weighing burden against potential benefit. An assessment of the palliative approach may be undertaken by investigating which drugs and procedures are used in the dying phase, and at what frequencies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
New Zealand | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 19% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 6 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 39% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 25% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 11% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2014.
All research outputs
#6,566,563
of 23,510,717 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,107
of 7,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,074
of 261,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#65
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,510,717 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.