↓ Skip to main content

Differential timing and latitudinal variation in sex ratio of Aquatic Warblers during the autumn migration

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Differential timing and latitudinal variation in sex ratio of Aquatic Warblers during the autumn migration
Published in
The Science of Nature, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00114-017-1525-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katarzyna Wojczulanis-Jakubas, Małgorzata E. Chrostek, Frédéric Jiguet, Carlos Zumalacárregui Martínez, David Miguélez, Júlio M. Neto

Abstract

Differential migration has been extensively reported in spring, but less so in autumn, particularly in relation to sex in monomorphic bird species. Here, we analysed the autumn passage of a monomorphic, globally threatened passerine, the Aquatic Warbler Acrocephalus paludicola throughout Western Europe, with regard to age and sex. We showed that, overall, adults migrated earlier than first-year birds, and males migrated earlier than females during the autumn migration. This may be caused by an overall social dominance of adults over immatures, and differentiated migration strategy of males and females. In addition, we found male-skewed sex proportions, with a tendency to an equalised ratio in more southern stopover sites. This may indicate a male bias in the global population or different migration strategies of the sexes. Differential migration may cause the age and sex classes to be exposed differently to various threats affecting demographic structure of the species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 28%
Student > Bachelor 3 17%
Other 3 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 50%
Arts and Humanities 2 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 11%
Psychology 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2017.
All research outputs
#14,582,479
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#1,797
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,646
of 327,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#13
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.