You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Depression, Coronary Artery Disease, and Physical Activity: How Much Exercise Is Enough?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Therapeutics, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.10.003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Janey C. Peterson, Mary E. Charlson, Martin T. Wells, Margaret Altemus |
| Abstract |
The mechanisms by which depressive symptoms negatively affect clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) remain poorly understood. Previous interventions that have attempted to treat depressive symptoms in patients with CAD to improve their clinical outcomes have been disappointing. Our objectives were, among a cohort of CAD patients, to evaluate the impact of depressive symptoms over time, controlling for comorbidity, in determining both successful long-term lifestyle change (ie, increased physical activity), and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality outcomes. In addition, we examined the impact of physical activity changes over time on 2 known mediators of cardiovascular morbidity: parasympathetic tone and inflammation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 81% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 233 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 14% |
| Researcher | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 39 | 17% |
| Unknown | 52 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 23% |
| Psychology | 39 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 25 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 12% |
| Unknown | 57 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2018.
All research outputs
#1,389,741
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Therapeutics
#109
of 3,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,562
of 269,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Therapeutics
#1
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.