↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: High Heels Increase Women’s Attractiveness

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 3,785)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
34 news outlets
blogs
16 blogs
twitter
103 X users
weibo
2 weibo users
facebook
14 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: High Heels Increase Women’s Attractiveness
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10508-014-0422-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolas Guéguen

Abstract

Research has found that the appearance of women's apparel helps increase their attractiveness as rated by men and that men care more about physical features in potential opposite-sex mates. However, the effect of sartorial appearance has received little interest from scientists. In a series of studies, the length of women's shoe heels was examined. A woman confederate wearing black shoes with 0, 5, or 9 cm heels asked men for help in various circumstances. In Study 1, she asked men to respond to a short survey on gender equality. In Study 2, the confederate asked men and women to participate in a survey on local food habit consumption. In Study 3, men and women in the street were observed while walking in back of the female confederate who dropped a glove apparently unaware of her loss. It was found that men's helping behavior increased as soon as heel length increased. However, heel length had no effect on women's helping behavior. It was also found that men spontaneously approached women more quickly when they wore high-heeled shoes (Study 4). Change in gait, foot-size judgment, and misattribution of sexiness and sexual intent were used as possible explanations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 103 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 3 3%
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Mexico 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Lebanon 1 <1%
Unknown 104 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 16%
Student > Master 9 8%
Researcher 8 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Other 34 29%
Unknown 18 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 9%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 6%
Design 5 4%
Other 29 25%
Unknown 24 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 448. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2023.
All research outputs
#63,402
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#45
of 3,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#533
of 372,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#1
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.