| Title |
Exploring Community Collaborations: Social Network Analysis as a Reflective Tool for Public Health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systemic Practice and Action Research, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11213-012-9271-7 |
| Authors |
Anita Kothari, Nadia Hamel, Jo-Anne MacDonald, Mechthild Meyer, Benita Cohen, Dorothy Bonnenfant |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 60% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 118 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 17% |
| Researcher | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 23 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 33 | 27% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Psychology | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 20% |
| Unknown | 29 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2014.
All research outputs
#13,973,867
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Systemic Practice and Action Research
#63
of 140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,063
of 285,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systemic Practice and Action Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 140 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them