↓ Skip to main content

Genetics of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: Review and Recommendations for Genome-Wide Association Studies

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
160 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Genetics of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: Review and Recommendations for Genome-Wide Association Studies
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11920-010-0126-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marilyn C. Cornelis, Nicole R. Nugent, Ananda B. Amstadter, Karestan C. Koenen

Abstract

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a prevalent, disabling anxiety disorder that constitutes a major health care burden. Despite evidence supporting a genetic predisposition to PTSD, the precise genetic loci remain unclear. Herein we review the current state and limitations of genetic research on PTSD. Although recent years have seen an exponential increase in the number of studies examining the influence of candidate genes on PTSD diagnosis and symptomatology, most studies have been characterized by relatively low rates of PTSD, with apparent inconsistencies in gene associations linked to marked differences in methodology. We further discuss how current advances in the genetics field can be applied to studies of PTSD, emphasizing the need to adapt a genome-wide approach that facilitates discovery rather than hypothesis testing. Genome-wide association studies offer the best opportunity to identify novel "true" risk variants for the disorder that in turn has the potential to inform our understanding of PTSD etiology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 209 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 37 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 16%
Researcher 33 15%
Student > Master 24 11%
Student > Postgraduate 17 8%
Other 45 21%
Unknown 27 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 63 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 10%
Neuroscience 21 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 9%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 32 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,307,161
of 25,247,084 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#155
of 1,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,007
of 102,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,247,084 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.