↓ Skip to main content

Medication-Related Fall Incidents in an Older, Ambulant Population: The B-PROOF Study

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs & Aging, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
29 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
Title
Medication-Related Fall Incidents in an Older, Ambulant Population: The B-PROOF Study
Published in
Drugs & Aging, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40266-014-0225-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annelies C. Ham, Karin M. A. Swart, Anke W. Enneman, Suzanne C. van Dijk, Sadaf Oliai Araghi, Janneke P. van Wijngaarden, Nikita L. van der Zwaluw, Elske M. Brouwer-Brolsma, Rosalie A. M. Dhonukshe-Rutten, Natasja M. van Schoor, Tischa J. M. van der Cammen, Paul Lips, Lisette C. P. G. M. de Groot, André G. Uitterlinden, Renger F. Witkamp, Bruno H. Stricker, Nathalie van der Velde

Abstract

Medication use is a potentially modifiable risk factor for falling; psychotropic and cardiovascular drugs have been indicated as main drug groups that increase fall risk. However, evidence is mainly based on studies that recorded falls retrospectively and/or did not determine medication use at the time of the fall. Therefore, we investigated the associations indicated in the literature between medication use and falls, using prospectively recorded falls and medication use determined at the time of the fall.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 145 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 19%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Other 11 7%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 31 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 39 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2014.
All research outputs
#2,055,153
of 25,546,214 outputs
Outputs from Drugs & Aging
#96
of 1,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,819
of 268,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs & Aging
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,546,214 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.