↓ Skip to main content

Prostate cancer detection using quantitative T2 and T2‐weighted imaging: The effects of 5‐alpha‐reductase inhibitors in men on active surveillance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prostate cancer detection using quantitative T2 and T2‐weighted imaging: The effects of 5‐alpha‐reductase inhibitors in men on active surveillance
Published in
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, November 2017
DOI 10.1002/jmri.25891
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesco Giganti, Giulio Gambarota, Caroline M. Moore, Nicola L. Robertson, Neil McCartan, Charles Jameson, Simon R.J. Bott, Mathias Winkler, Brandon Whitcher, Ramiro Castro‐Santamaria, Mark Emberton, Clare Allen, Alex Kirkham

Abstract

T2 -weighted imaging (T2 -WI) information has been used in a qualitative manner in the assessment of prostate cancer. Quantitative derivatives (T2 relaxation time) can be generated from T2 -WI. These outputs may be useful in helping to discriminate clinically significant prostate cancer from background signal. To investigate changes in quantitative T2 parameters in lesions and noncancerous tissue of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer taking dutasteride 0.5 mg or placebo daily for 6 months. Retrospective. Forty men randomized to 6 months of daily dutasteride (n = 20) or placebo (n = 20). Multiparametric 3T MRI at baseline and 6 months. This included a multiecho MR sequence for quantification of the T2 relaxation times, in three regions of interest (index lesion, noncancerous peripheral [PZ] and transitional [TZ] zones). A synthetic signal contrast (T2 Q contrast) between lesion and noncancerous tissue was assessed using quantitative T2 values. Signal contrast was calculated using the T2 -weighted sequence (T2 W contrast). Two radiologists reviewed the scans in consensus according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS v. 2) guidelines. Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney U-tests, Spearman's correlation. When compared to noncancerous tissue, shorter T2 values were observed within lesions at baseline (83.5 and 80.5 msec) and 6 months (81.5 and 81.9 msec) in the placebo and dutasteride arm, respectively. No significant differences for T2 W contrast at baseline and after 6 months were observed, both in the placebo (0.40 [0.29-0.49] vs. 0.43 [0.25-0.49]; P = 0.881) and dutasteride arm (0.35 [0.24-0.47] vs. 0.37 [0.22-0.44]; P = 0.668). There was a significant, positive correlation between the T2 Q contrast and the T2 W contrast values (r = 0.786; P < 0.001). The exposure to antiandrogen therapy did not significantly influence the T2 contrast or the T2 relaxation values in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer. 4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Lecturer 6 9%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 4 6%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 22 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 29%
Computer Science 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 28 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2018.
All research outputs
#13,973,827
of 24,477,448 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
#2,064
of 3,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,921
of 330,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
#8
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,477,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,781 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.