↓ Skip to main content

Pressure profile and morphology of the arteries along the giraffe limb

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology B, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Pressure profile and morphology of the arteries along the giraffe limb
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology B, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00360-010-0545-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristine Hovkjær Østergaard, Mads F. Bertelsen, Emil T. Brøndum, Christian Aalkjær, J. Michael Hasenkam, Morten Smerup, Tobias Wang, Jens Randel Nyengaard, Ulrik Baandrup

Abstract

Giraffes are the tallest animals on earth and the effects of gravity on their cardiovascular system have puzzled physiologists for centuries. The authors measured arterial and venous pressure in the foreleg of anesthetized giraffes, suspended in upright standing position, and determined the ratio between tunica media and lumen areas along the length of the femoral/tibial arteries in the hindleg. Volume fraction of elastin, density of vasa vasorum and innervations was estimated by stereology. Immunohistological staining with S100 was used to examine the innervation. The pressure increase in the artery and vein along the foreleg was not significantly different from what was expected on basis of gravity. The area of the arterial lumen in the hindleg decreased towards the hoof from 11.2 ± 4.2 to 0.6 ± 0.5 mm(2) (n = 10, P = 0.001), but most of this narrowing occurred within 2-4 cm immediately below the knee. This abrupt narrowing was associated with a marked increase in media to lumen area ratio (from 1.2 ± 0.5 to 7.8 ± 2.5; P = 0.001), and a decrease in mean volume fraction of elastin from 38 ± 6% proximal to the narrowing to 5.8 ± 1.1% distally (P = 0.001). The narrowing had a six-fold higher innervation density than the immediate distal and proximal regions. The sudden narrowing was also observed in the hind legs of neonates, indicating that it does not develop as an adaptation to the high transmural pressure in the standing giraffe. More likely it represents a preadaptation to the high pressures experienced by adult giraffes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 3 7%
Netherlands 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 38 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Student > Master 6 14%
Professor 4 9%
Other 4 9%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 16%
Computer Science 5 12%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 7 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2014.
All research outputs
#21,866,582
of 24,395,432 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#744
of 840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,438
of 188,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,395,432 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.