Title |
Quantum-Spacetime Phenomenology
|
---|---|
Published in |
Living Reviews in Relativity, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.12942/lrr-2013-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Giovanni Amelino-Camelia |
Abstract |
I review the current status of phenomenological programs inspired by quantum-spacetime research. I stress in particular the significance of results establishing that certain data analyses provide sensitivity to effects introduced genuinely at the Planck scale. My main focus is on phenomenological programs that affect the directions taken by studies of quantum-spacetime theories. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | 20% |
Italy | 2 | 20% |
Canada | 1 | 10% |
United States | 1 | 10% |
Guinea-Bissau | 1 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
Scientists | 3 | 30% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
China | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 101 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 22% |
Researcher | 17 | 16% |
Professor | 10 | 9% |
Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
Other | 22 | 21% |
Unknown | 16 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy | 78 | 73% |
Philosophy | 2 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | <1% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Unknown | 19 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,067,006
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Living Reviews in Relativity
#17
of 150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,493
of 211,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Living Reviews in Relativity
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them