↓ Skip to main content

Setting the record straight: a rebuttal to an erroneous analysis on transgenic insecticidal crops and natural enemies

Overview of attention for article published in Transgenic Research, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Setting the record straight: a rebuttal to an erroneous analysis on transgenic insecticidal crops and natural enemies
Published in
Transgenic Research, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11248-009-9260-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony M. Shelton, Steven E. Naranjo, Jörg Romeis, Richard L. Hellmich, Jeffrey D. Wolt, Brian A. Federici, Ramon Albajes, Franz Bigler, Elisabeth P. J. Burgess, Galen P. Dively, Angharad M. R. Gatehouse, Louise A. Malone, Richard Roush, Mark Sears, Frantisek Sehnal

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Spain 3 4%
Argentina 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
France 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 67 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Student > Master 11 14%
Professor 7 9%
Other 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 3 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 73%
Environmental Science 5 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 8 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2014.
All research outputs
#2,934,773
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from Transgenic Research
#94
of 891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,069
of 93,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transgenic Research
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.